Walmart Removes Some Self-Checkout Options Due to a Billion-Dollar Problem – Theft
For nearly two decades, self-checkout lanes were championed as the epitome of retail innovation, promising an expedited and convenient shopping experience for customers while simultaneously offering significant labor cost reductions for businesses. They were envisioned as a win-win, a technological leap forward that would redefine the efficiency of the modern shopping trip. However, a growing body of evidence, bolstered by real-world operational results, is now compelling major retailers, including the colossal Walmart, to re-evaluate this once-heralded technology critically. In a move that signals a profound strategic shift across the industry, some Walmart locations are now changing their plan for their self-checkout kiosks, driven primarily by an increasingly pressing and financially debilitating issue: the pervasive problem of theft.
Walmart announced that it is making changes to its self-checkout plan by region and store. Some stores will have self-checkout lanes entirely removed, while others will limit their usage to specific groups of customers. This includes Walmart+ members and their home delivery drivers. This is not a complete removal of self-checkout from all stores, but it can include some stores removing those lanes where theft rates are high.
While the primary objective of self-checkouts was to streamline and speed up the consumer journey, they inadvertently opened new avenues for “shrink” – the retail industry’s comprehensive term for merchandise loss, which encompasses not only outright theft but also damage, administrative errors, and vendor fraud. A mounting volume of internal reports and publicly available police data consistently indicates that theft rates at self-checkout stations are substantially higher, sometimes dramatically so, than those observed at traditional, cashier-operated lanes. This widespread and escalating issue is proving to be a costly lesson for retailers who, in their initial enthusiasm for efficiency, embraced self-checkout with widespread adoption.
A compelling and widely cited case in point is the Walmart Supercenter in Shrewsbury, Missouri. Following the complete removal of all self-checkout machines, the store witnessed a truly dramatic reduction in theft-related incidents. According to an in-depth report by the Webster-Kirkwood Times, police calls dispatched to the store plummeted from a staggering 509 between January and May of the previous year (a period during which self-checkouts were fully operational) to a mere 183 during the identical five-month period this year (after their removal). The impact extended to law enforcement outcomes as well, with arrests for theft seeing a remarkable halving, dropping from 108 to 49. Shrewsbury Police Chief Lisa Vargas directly and unequivocally attributed this “huge change” to the elimination of the self-checkout systems, explicitly noting that it had become a common and recurring occurrence for individuals to depart the store with unscanned or unpaid items [Dillin, 2025; Parade, 2025]. The local community, too, has taken notice, with some residents expressing relief at the reduction in crime and the visible presence of more staff.
This isn’t an isolated phenomenon, confined to a single store in Missouri. Walmart has similarly enacted self-checkout removals in other strategic locations, including bustling urban centers like Cleveland, Ohio, and Albuquerque, New Mexico [Oliver, 2025]. While Walmart, in its public statements, maintains that these decisions are based on a multifaceted analysis of various operational factors – encompassing valuable customer and associate feedback, evolving shopping patterns, and specific store-level business needs – the undeniable and substantial impact of theft remains a critical, if not primary, consideration in these strategic shifts [People Magazine, 2025]. Data analytics platforms like Gitnux have provided sobering figures, estimating that self-checkout machines contribute to annual losses of approximately $3 billion across the retail sector, with the vast majority of this figure attributed directly to misuse, accidental errors, and, more significantly, intentional theft [Mundo Deportivo, 2025]. This staggering sum represents a significant hit to profit margins for companies already operating on tight margins.
Leading retail industry experts are largely in agreement with these empirical findings and the anecdotal evidence emerging from stores. Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, a renowned retail analytics firm, has frequently commented on the insidious nature of the problem. He asserts that “theft rates at self-checkouts are quite high as a result of intentional theft as well as accidental errors” [Saunders, cited in Straight Arrow News, 2025]. Furthermore, Saunders suggests that a strategic pivot towards encouraging more customers to utilize manned checkouts can effectively address many of these pervasive issues, ultimately leading to substantial financial savings for retailers by mitigating shrink [Saunders, cited in EURweb, 2025]. Indeed, academic and industry studies have meticulously indicated that certain product categories, particularly fresh produce due to its variable weight and lack of consistent barcoding, are significantly more prone to “missing scans” or deliberate under-scanning when processed through self-checkout lanes [RetailWire, 2025]. The psychological component also plays a role; some studies suggest that the absence of direct human interaction at self-checkouts may embolden individuals who might otherwise hesitate to steal.
The initial and compelling allure of self-checkouts was undoubtedly driven by the promise of substantial operational cost savings through reduced staffing requirements for checkout lanes. This perceived efficiency led to their rapid and widespread adoption across the retail landscape. However, retailers are now confronting the stark and harsh reality that the “pennies they saved on wages they reaped a thousandfold in theft on SCO,” as one candid Reddit user aptly observed, succinctly capturing the essence of the financial miscalculation [Parade, 2025]. The staggering financial losses incurred from increased theft, often hidden within broader shrink figures, can quickly eclipse and negate any potential labor savings, thereby rendering the self-checkout model financially unsustainable in numerous contexts. This re-evaluation underscores a critical lesson in business: short-term cost savings can lead to long-term, unforeseen liabilities.
While some segments of the customer base may express frustration or inconvenience over the perceived loss of speed and the potential for longer lines, especially for smaller, quick purchases, Walmart’s strategic shift reflects a deeply calculated decision. It’s a move aimed at combating a growing and financially debilitating drain on its massive operations. This decision by Walmart is not an isolated incident; rather, it aligns with a broader industry trend, as other major retailers such as Dollar General and Target are also actively re-evaluating, limiting, or even removing their self-checkout options to address strikingly similar concerns about escalating “shrink” [PaymentsJournal, 2024; FOX10 Phoenix, 2025]. Dollar General, for instance, has taken a particularly aggressive stance, removing self-checkout in approximately 12,000 stores and imposing strict limits – often five items or fewer – in others, with theft explicitly cited as a pivotal factor in these changes [PaymentsJournal, 2024]. Target, another retail giant, has similarly implemented a 10-item limit for self-checkout, with analysts directly linking this policy to concerted efforts to reduce theft-related losses and improve overall profitability [Saunders, cited in EURweb, 2025].
Crucially, it is important to acknowledge that Walmart is not abandoning technological innovation entirely, nor is it retreating from modernizing its retail operations. Rather, the company is actively exploring and implementing new, more secure technological solutions to enhance both efficiency and loss prevention. This includes the continued and successful operation of its “Scan & Go” system at Sam’s Club, which leverages sophisticated mobile applications, secure QR codes, and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) to track purchases with greater precision and significantly reduce shrink [Dillin, 2025]. Furthermore, Walmart is reportedly experimenting with cutting-edge AI-powered self-checkout kiosks that utilize advanced computer vision to accurately identify products without the need for traditional barcodes and to detect potential scanning errors or instances of theft in real-time [Kiosk Industry, 2025; SecurityTagStore.com, 2025]. The company is also at the forefront of testing “invisible barcodes” embedded directly onto product packaging, a technology developed in partnership with Digimarc. These innovative barcodes allow for automatic and seamless scanning without the need for customers or associates to manually locate a visible barcode, thereby improving scanning speed and significantly reducing the likelihood of missed scans, both accidental and intentional [TheStreet, 2024]. In some locations, hybrid models are also being trialed, where employees are strategically positioned to assist customers at self-checkout machines, ensuring a smoother, more efficient, and crucially, more secure transaction process [AVIXA Xchange, 2025]. These multi-pronged approaches demonstrate Walmart’s commitment to finding a sustainable and secure balance.
Ultimately, Walmart’s strategic decision to scale back on self-checkouts underscores the inherently complex and often challenging balancing act that retailers face in the 21st century: leveraging cutting-edge technology for operational efficiency and enhanced customer experience, while simultaneously and vigorously safeguarding against significant financial losses due to theft. The undeniable and escalating rise in theft, particularly that which has been inadvertently facilitated by the very design of self-service stations, has clearly exerted sufficient pressure to push the pendulum back towards a greater emphasis on traditional, human-staffed checkout lanes in numerous locations across the country. This shift serves as a powerful reminder that in the ongoing fight against retail crime, sometimes, the invaluable human element and the oversight it provides remain irreplaceable in protecting a business’s bottom line and ensuring a secure shopping environment for honest consumers.
Bibliography
AVIXA Xchange. (2025, March 28). Walmart Digital Signage and Self Checkout March News. Retrieved from https://xchange.avixa.org/posts/walmart-digital-signage-and-self-checkout-march-news
Dillin, R. (2025, June 20). Walmart Makes Sudden Self-Checkout Decision After Alarming Police Data. Men’s Journal. Retrieved from https://www.mensjournal.com/news/walmart-makes-sudden-self-checkout-decision-after-alarming-police-data
EURweb. (2025, May 5). Target Caps Self-Checkout at 10 Items Amid Shrink (Theft) Concerns. Retrieved from https://eurweb.com/2025/target-limits-self-checkout-10-items-theft-concerns/
FOX10 Phoenix. (2025, May 5). Target pulls the plug on self-checkout amid shoplifting surge. Retrieved from https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/target-stops-self-checkout-shoplifting-2025
Kiosk Industry. (2025, March 22). Walmart Self-Checkout March 2025 Update. Retrieved from https://kioskindustry.org/walmart-self-checkout-march-2025-update/
Mundo Deportivo. (2025, June 22). Walmart surprises everyone with this move regarding its self-checkout stations. Retrieved from https://www.mundodeportivo.com/us/en/20250622/725006/walmart-surprises-everyone-with-this-move-regarding-its-self-checkout-stations.html
Oliver. (2025, April 15). Why Walmart Changed Its Self-Checkout Strategy: Insights and Recommendations. Retrieved from https://oliverpos.com/why-walmart-changed-its-self-checkout-strategy-insights-and-recommendations/
Parade. (2025, June 20). Walmart Debuts Self Checkout Change That Could Affect All Stores. Retrieved from https://parade.com/news/walmart-store-debuts-major-self-checkout-change
PaymentsJournal. (2024, July 9). Major Retailers Pull Back from Self-Checkout Due to Theft Concerns. Retrieved from https://www.paymentsjournal.com/major-retailers-pull-back-from-self-checkout-due-to-theft-concerns/
People Magazine. (2025, June 21). This Walmart Store Has Seen a ‘Huge’ Decrease in Shoplifting After Making 1 Major Change. Retrieved from https://people.com/walmart-in-missouri-removes-self-checkout-shoplifting-decreased-11758617
RetailWire. (2025, March 27). Is Self-Checkout Leading to Increased Retail Theft, and Why Do Some Americans Feel Justified in Stealing?. Retrieved from https://retailwire.com/discussion/self-checkout-increased-retail-theft/
SecurityTagStore.com. (2025, February 25). Walmart’s Crackdown on Self-Checkout Theft: AI Surveillance & Nationwide Bans. Retrieved from https://www.securitytagstore.com/retail-security-blog/self-checkout-scams-and-shoplifting-are-shaping-the-future-of-retail-security
Straight Arrow News. (2025, May 4). Target joins retailers in scaling back self-checkout lanes. Retrieved from https://san.com/cc/target-joins-retailers-in-scaling-back-self-checkout-lanes/
TheStreet. (2024, September 17). Walmart quietly tests self-checkout feature that can curb theft. Retrieved from https://www.thestreet.com/retail/walmart-quietly-rolls-out-new-way-to-curb-theft-at-self-checkout